Impact of collection methods on semen quality, fertility, and hatchability in nunukan chickens

Authors

  • Novemia Fatmarisch Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Khoiru Indana Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Jusyenti Manullang Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • I M.U. Raharja Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Bryta Mbincar Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Fikri Ardhani Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v15i3.554

Keywords:

Collection method, Fertility, Hatchability, Quality, Semen

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the fertility and hatchability of Nunukan chickens responding to the rooster semen collected using the dorso-abdominal massage method and a collection tube by presenting a teaser. A total of 20 male Nunukan chickens were divided into two treatment groups, in healthy condition, aged 12-36 months, body weight 2.5-3.4 kg, and housed individually (35x45x60 cm3); the semen was collected every three days. Semen characteristics evaluated macroscopically included color, odor, consistency, volume, and pH; microscopically included sperm concentration, mass motility, progressive individual motility, total sperm per ejaculate, viability, abnormality, and sperm quality factor (SQF); furthermore, the artificial insemination technique was used to evaluate the effect of sperm quality on fertility and hatchability. Both methods showed no difference in macroscopic parameters; color, odor, consistency, and pH, and microscopic parameters (p>0.05); concentration, viability, abnormality, mass motility, and progressive individual motility. While semen volume, total sperm per ejaculate, and SQF showed significant differences (p<0.05). However, the fertility and hatchability rates are not significantly different (p>0.05). Despite the high quantitative qualities of rooster semen obtained with collection tubes and female teasers, Nunukan chickens' fertility and hatchability did not differ significantly (p>0.05) from other semen collection methods.

 

Keywords: collection method;  fertility; hatchability, semen, quality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Novemia Fatmarisch, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Animal Breeding and Reproduction Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University Jl. Paser Balengkong Kampus Gunung Kelua Samarinda, 75123, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

Khoiru Indana, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Animal Breeding and Reproduction Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University Jl. Paser Balengkong Kampus Gunung Kelua Samarinda, 75123, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

Jusyenti Manullang, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Animal Breeding and Reproduction Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University Jl. Paser Balengkong Kampus Gunung Kelua Samarinda, 75123, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

I M.U. Raharja, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Animal Breeding and Reproduction Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University Jl. Paser Balengkong Kampus Gunung Kelua Samarinda, 75123, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

Bryta Mbincar, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Animal Breeding and Reproduction Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University Jl. Paser Balengkong Kampus Gunung Kelua Samarinda, 75123, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

Fikri Ardhani, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Animal Breeding and Reproduction Laboratory, Animal Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University Jl. Paser Balengkong Kampus Gunung Kelua Samarinda, 75123, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

References

Al-Daraji HJ. 2015. Effect Of Semen Collection Method On Fertility And Hatchability Rates And Sperm Penetration Holes Of Ostrich (Struthio Camelus). Available at: www.roavs.com.

Andaruisworo S, Nur S, Erna Y, Ardina T and Anifiatiningrum A. 2024. Arabic Chicken from Marriage with Artificial Insemination (IB) Using a Manual Hatching Machine On Fertility And Hatchability. Jurnal Ternak. . https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v14i2.177.

Ardhani F. 2018. Semen and Sperm Characteristics of Nunukan Rooster. in International Conference on Tropical of Agrifood, Feed, and Fuel (ICTAFF) 2018 : Sustainability of Food, Feed, and Fuel Tropical Resources for Quality Future. Samarinda, Indonesia. Agriculture Faculty, Mulawarman University 95–100.

Bakst MR and Long JA. 2014. 2 Nd Edition: Techniques For Semen Evaluation, Semen Storage, And Fertility Determination. Available at: www.midwestpoultry.com.

Bintari IG, Iswati I, Udrayana SBU and Bakar A. 2024. Fertility and hatchability of KUB chicken eggs results from artificial insemination using liquid semen with carrot juice supplementation. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science). 14(4): 170–174. https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v14i4.475.

Brillard JP. 2009. Practical aspects of fertility in poultry. Avian Biology Research. 2(1–2): 41–45. https://doi.org/10.3184/175815509X431803.

Churchil RR, Praveena PE and Sharma D. 2014. Semen quality parameters, their inter-relationship and post-washing sperm attributes of Rhode Island Red roosters. Veterinary World. 7(12): 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.1117-1122.

Ghadimi M, Najafi A, Sharifi S, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A and Mehr MR-A. 2024. Effects of dietary Moringa oleifera leaf extract on semen characteristics, fertility, and hatchability in aged broiler breeder roosters. Poultry Science. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103491.

Haipeng S, Li B, Tong Q, Zheng W and Zeng D. 2020. Mating Behaviour and Fertility Of Layer Breeders In Natural Mating Colony Cages: LED Light Environmental Effects. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-55657/v1.

Hambu E, Arifiantini I, Purwantara B and Darwati S. 2016. Raw Semen Characteristics of Three Different Indonesian Local Roosters. ANIMAL PRODUCTION. 18: 165. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.anprod.2016.18.3.555.

Hermiz H, Shaker A, Hasafa B, Al-Khatib T, Sardary S and Toma J. 2016. Evaluation Semen Characterization of Roosters Resulted from Different Local Lines and Their Crosses with ISA Brown. 1: 7–14.

Iskandaria W, Anggriani S, Shaharani A and Wahyuni M. 2023. Development of Free-Range Chicken (Gallus domesticus) Egg Embryos With Brood Incubation and Incubation. Jurnal Biologi Tropis. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v23i1.4584.

Isnaeni M, Faidiban OR and Tethool AN. 2019. Concentration and Motility Spermatozoa of Ayam Kampung (Gallus domesticus) in Ringer Laktat Diluents Adding Red Fruit Oil (Pandanus conoideus Lam). Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science). 9(2): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.30862/jipvet.v9i2.65.

Khoso ZA, Rajput N, Hussain Leghari I and Kaka A. 2024. Impact of Preserved Semen on Fertility and Hatchability of Fayomi Hen Eggs. https://doi.org/10.55627/Javs.03.1.0581.

Latif A, Ijaz A, Aleem M and Mahmud A. 2005. Effect Of Osmotic Pressure and PH On The Short-Term Storage And Fertility Of Broiler Breeder SpermPakistan Vet. J.

Liu SJ, Zheng JX and Yang N. 2008. Semen quality factor as an indicator of fertilizing ability for geese. Poultry Science. 87(1): 155–159. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00300.

Lukaszewicz E and Kruszyński W. 2003. Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed semen of individual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology. Theriogenology. 59: 1627–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01209-8.

Machebe N and Ezekwe A. 2002. Ejaculate Characteristics of three genotypes of local cocks in the humid tropics. Agro-Science. J.Tropical Agric., Food, Environt., and Ext. 3. https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v3i2.1510.

Malik A, Haron AW, Nesa M, Bukar M and Kasim A. 2013. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES. 37: 564–568. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1107-26.

Mussa NJ, Boonkum W and Chankitisakul V. 2023. Semen Quality Traits of Two Thai Native Chickens Producing a High and a Low of Semen Volumes. Veterinary Sciences. 10(2): 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10020073.

Peters SO, Shoyebo OD, Ilori BM, Ozoje MO, Ikeobi CON and Adebambo OA. 2008. Semen quality traits of seven strain of chickens raised in the humid tropics. International Journal of Poultry Science. 7(10): 949–953. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.949.953.

Piedra A, Muñoz M, Argudo Garzón D, Samaniego C J, Maldonado M, Cabrera B, Alvarado J and Galarza DA. 2021. Comparison of characterization of fighting rooster (Gallus gallus) semen ejaculates recovered by electroejaculation and dorsal massage techniques. SPERMOVA. 11: 32–38. https://doi.org/10.18548/aspe/0009.05.

Rakha B, Ansari M, Akhter S and Blesbois E. 2017. Effect of season and age on Indian red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) semen characteristics: A 4-year retrospective study. Theriogenology. 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.05.016.

Sabry M El, Abdelfattah M, Abdellatif H and Elnesr S. 2022. The impact of magnetized drinking water on semen quality, fertility and hatchability rates of Fayoumi chicken. Animal Biotechnology. 34: 2353–2359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2088553.

Sabzian-Melei R, Zare-Shahneh A, Zhandi M, Yousefi A and Rafieian-Naeini H. 2022. Effects of dietary supplementation of different sources and levels of selenium on the semen quality and reproductive performance in aged broiler breeder roosters. Poultry Science. 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101908.

Sarkar KP. 2020. Motility, Viability and Fertilizing Ability of Avian Sperm Stored Under in Vitro Conditions. Reviews in Agricultural Science. 8: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.8.0_15.

Syamsudin GH, Tanwiriah W and Sujana E. 2016. The Fertility, Hatchability and DOC Weight of Sentul Chicken at Warso Unggul Gemilang Farm-Bogor. Student e-Journal Unpad. 5 (4).

Tarif AMM, Musharraf M, Bhuiyan U, Ferdousy RN, Bazlur M and Mollah R. 2013. Evaluation of semen quality among four chicken lines. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS). 6(5): 7–13. Available at: www.iosrjournals.org.

Tuncer PB, Kinet H, Özdoğan N, Demiral Ö O, Barbaros Tuncer P, Kinet Hüseyin, Özdoğan Neval, Demiral Ö Orkun, Horozlarında D, Spermatolojik B and Değerlendirilmesi Ö. 2006. Evaluation Of Some Spermatological Characteristics In Denizli CocksAraştırma Makalesi J Fac Vet Med Univ Erciyes.

Udrayana SB, Kasianto K, Iswati I and Bintari IG. 2023. Evaluating sperm quality characteristics obtained through the female teaser method in native chicken breeds. Livestock and Animal Research. 21(3): 127. https://doi.org/10.20961/lar.v21i3.66495.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-17

How to Cite

Fatmarisch, N. ., Indana, K. ., Manullang, J. ., Raharja, I. M. ., Mbincar, B. ., & Ardhani, F. (2025). Impact of collection methods on semen quality, fertility, and hatchability in nunukan chickens . Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Dan Veteriner Tropis (Journal of Tropical Animal and Veterinary Science), 15(3), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v15i3.554